ARTS AND
SCIENCES CURRICULUM COMMITTEE
ANNUAL REPORT, 2008-2009
Meetings
The ASCC met seven times during the academic year: 9/30/08,
10/21/08, 11/11/08, 12/15/08 2/10/09, 3/17/09 and 4/14/08.
Committee Membership
The members of the committee were Robbin Crabtree, Jessica
Davis, Robert Epstein, Shannon Harding, Manyul Im (Replaced by Nels Pearson,
Fall '08), Danke Li (Replaced by Les Schaffer Fall '08), John
Miecznikowski, Elizabeth Petrino (Chair, Fall '08; Replaced by Michael
Pagano Spring '09), James Shanahan (Chair, 'Spring 09), Joan Weiss
New Course Proposals:
This year the ASCC considered and approved 37 new course
proposals.
Report of the Subcommittee on Internships, Independent
Studies, and Supervised Research (Steve Bayne
and Beth Boquet)
Profs.
Steve Bayne and Associate Dean Beth Boquet reported from the Subcommittee on
Internships, Independent Studies, and Supervised Research. The subcommittee
forwarded to the Dean its findings on the need for consistency, encouraging the
departments to have discussions on issues of organizing credits. The report
included the proposal that such credits could be "bundled" together,
and that a bundle of 15 would count for the equivalent of one course. If the
bundled credits were the responsibility of more than one instructor, and if a
department had a large number of such credits, then there should be a professor
officially in charge of them, and this position should be rotated. The person
deemed by the department to be the professor of record for a given semester
should have additional responsibilities, including communicating with other
instructors and coordinating the student work. Finally, the report also
included a suggestion for a "banking" system, by which an instructor
could receive one point for each time he or she supervises a student receiving
3 credits of work. Once the instructor reaches 20 points, he or she would earn
a one-course teaching reduction.
The
following MOTION was made:
That the ASCC endorses the
report of the subcommittee, with the understanding that its numbers are
contingent and subject to review by the Dean, and that the report be passed on
to the departments within the College with the encouragement that the document
be used as a starting point for discussions of teaching load and credits.
The
motion passed: 8 votes in favor, 1 abstention.
In a subsequent meeting, this MOTION was changed to:
That the ASCC endorses the
report of the subcommittee with the understanding that its contents (in particular
its numbers) are contingent upon and subject to review by the Dean.
The
motion carried with 4 in favor, 4 abstaining.[1] The Dean did not vote.
Graduate American Studies Curriculum Review
The ASCC invited Prof. Kurt Schlichting to speak to the ASCC
on how the Graduate American Studies program was developed and its current
curriculum review procedure.
Prof. Schlichting reviewed the history of the program and
offered responses to a variety of concerns that were raised by the ASCC in past
years. Primarily these concerns related to whether various courses had been
approved by the ASCC. Prof. Schlichting informed the committee that the
Graduate American Studies Curriculum Committee is aware of the need to pass
courses through normal channels, and that this is now occurring. The committee
and Professor Schlichting agreed to maintain open channels of communication,
with all new courses coming through ASCC and the American Studies committee
reviewing existing courses as necessary.
Guide for
Academic Program Review in the College of Arts and Sciences
Prof. Miecznikowski reported on academic program review to
the ASCC. A document containing principles for academic program review had been
circulated by the Dean; the ASCC was given the document for comment. The Dean
had asked that "The ASCC members should discuss the program review
document, and collect any suggestions or changes to send back up to me and the
task force. In particular, ASCC should be sure it's comfortable with the
various places for its role in the program review process." The ASCC was
also asked to endorse the document, which it did unanimously.
ASCC
subcommittee on graduate course review
Prof. Peter Bayers reported from a subcommittee that
discussed how new graduate courses would be proposed and reviewed. He submitted
a new form for submission to ASCC, which is a modification of the undergraduate
form. The ASCC unanimously agreed to accept the new form. It is affirmed that
graduate programs are under the purview of the ASCC, although the Dean is in
the process of convening other group(s) to advise her on matters relating to
the growing graduate programs in the College.
Dept. Of Mathematics And Computer Science: Four-Course
Certificate Program In The Mathematics Of Finance
The Department of Mathematics and Computer Science presented
a proposal to formally approve a certificate in the Mathematics of Finance. The
certificate was already being offered; this proposal was in response to a request
from the ASCC to formally approve the certificate.
The ASCC agreed that it would recommend an approval process
in the College of Arts and Sciences for certificate programs that requires
department, ASCC, and CAS Dean approval. The following MOTION was made:
That
all certificate programs in the College of Arts and Sciences must be approved
by their administering departments/programs, the Arts and Sciences Curriculum
Committee, and the Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences. This motion was
approved unanimously. The certificate program was also approved unanimously
after this process was adopted.
Shanahan reported on this new process to the College at the
final faculty meeting.
Items Pending before the Committee:[2]
Due
Fall 2009: Major in New Media Film, Television, and Radio five-year review.
Due
May 2011: Irish Studies five-year review.
Due
May 2011: Catholic Studies five-year review.
Due
May 2011: Master of Arts in Communication Corporate Cohort Program five-year
review.
Due
May 2013: MFA in Creative Writing five-year review.
Due
May 2013: BS in Biochemistry five-year review.
Due
May 2013: On campus MA in Communication five-year review.
4/4
student, 3/2 teaching load (tabled September 2005; no due date).
Report of the subcommittee on cross listing.
Respectfully by,
E. Petrino & J. Shanahan
Chairs, 2008-2009[3]
[1] See
minutes of 11/11/08 for details.
[2] The
status of some of these items is not clear to the current committee. The ASCC
for 2009-2010 will need to review these items, along with program reviews that
may come online as a result of the new process installed by the Dean.
[3] Petrino
was chair in Fall 2008; Shanahan was chair in Spring 2009.