Arts & Sciences Curriculum Committee
Draft
Minutes
March
21,
2017
3:30-5:00
p.m.
CNS
304
In attendance: Steven Bayne, Ryan Drake,
Johanna Garvey,
David McFadden, Margaret McClure, Laura McSweeney, Laura Nash, Giovanni
Ruffini
(Chair), Terry Ann Jones, Lynn Sally, Jaqueline
Vernarelli
Meeting Began at 3:30pm.
Approval of
minutes from meeting of February 14, 2017
Motion:
Jaqueline Vernarelli moves to approve; Laura McSweeney seconds
Vote:
All in favor;
motion passes unanimously |
Note of Actions Taken by the Chair:
Ruffini – Most of these actions are relatively
self-explanatory. The one that was slightly confusing was moving the
Health
Communication for Health Care Professionals from a CO number to an HS
number. I attached the
minutes which I
hope will clarify what is going on there.
I have a response from the ACEC regarding the
Committee’s motion passed for certificate language and governance
documents for
certificate language. They want the ASCC to take this to the EPC first.
I’m not
clear, and was unable to get an explanation, as to why they thought EPC
had jurisdiction
over the governance language for certificates.
They write that:
EPC has already had some discussions over
certificate programs and they play a large role in the development in
the JOR appendices
on approvals and routing. We
agree that
there is a need for clarification with regards to certificate programs,
but the
solution you prefer may be unnecessarily complex for these programs that
simply
package a small set of courses that have already been approved. We would
like
to suggest that the EPC consider a new appendix that would define
certificate
programs, clarify what materials would be needed for a proposal and
specify a
routing procedure.
Ruffini will not consider the ASCC’s role in
this complete until he receives word from Carl Scheraga, Chair of the
EPC.
MFA Certificate Program
·
Sonya Huber – The certificate
program will be a new piece of the MFA program.
This has come about partially in response to the needs of writers
who
don’t yet want to commit to a full MFA program, but have writing
projects
underway and want to take classes.
The Certificate would:
o
Allow students to get samples.
o
Let students that are not able to
commit to the full structure of the MFA program (4 nine day residencies
and 4
semesters) to do 2 semesters remotely.
Benefits:
o
MFA faculty is in favor of this
because it would give them additional mentoring revenue.
o
Nothing needs to be done in terms
of changes to the program.
o
It allows an on ramp for
additional students to come into the program after they have a chance to get mentoring. They have an opportunity
to get a sense of what the MFA program is actually about.
o
12 credits will be transferrable
if
a student is admitted.
§
Admission process for the program
remains in place.
·
Drake - Will this be taught
mainly by adjuncts? Will they support this?
·
Huber –There are 3 full time
faculty members that work with the MFA program; the rest of our staff is
adjuncts. They are in support of this. It wouldn’t be a situation where
they
are asked to take on certificate program mentees and feel obligated to
do so.
If for some reason the part time faculty is unable to work in the
certificate
program, we have a full roster of MFA graduates that can take that on.
·
Nash – In undergraduate programs,
people can pay to take a class.
1.
Why would they need to get a certificate if
they are not taking classes?
2. Why can’t the adjuncts work with them directly as a resource?
Why is it a certificate
program
working 1 on 1?
·
Huber:
1. The packaging
of a certificate offers 12
graduate credits. The fact that it is work that can then be transferred
into
the program is an option that only a few other low residence programs in
the
country offer.
2. When you
have a writer that wants to take a graduate class, they need a certain
level of
skill. It takes a
certain level of
assessing where they are at (a pretty intensive process).
It’s more difficult to have a drop
in situation without having a student submit a sample.
We want some sort of control over who comes
in. Because of our program
structure, we
have not had the ability to take out the courses from a low residency
structure
to a degree program.
The difference between a 1 on 1 with feedback
(on their work) and a casual relationship, is that most of our mentors
have
been with the program coming up on 10 years.
They have developed a specific system of working with low
residence
students over a course of a semester.
Many
of these faculty members do
take on
additional individual editing relationships.
The benefit of the certificate is the graduate credit, a
structured format
and mentoring while working on a book.
·
Nash- Still doesn’t understand
why this has to be a certificate, and not just taking a class.
·
Sally – There are no classes in
an MFA program. You can’t come in and sign up for a 3 credit course. The
MFA
program has a 9 day residency which is 6 credits. Then there is a five
month
experience (9 credits) one on one, very laid out and detailed. The
certificate proposal will take out the
five month mentorship, and cluster two of them together. At the end of
this
mentor process they will have a book.
·
Bayne – You said the only
resources
necessary would be the additional stipends - 2/3 of the faculty MFA
stipend. What
is the rate of the current MFA Stipend?
·
Huber – Two tiers depending on
how long the faculty member has been with the program.
o
2,100 per student per semester
o
2,400 per student per semester
·
Bayne – 6,600 for 12 credits,
will that cover the cost of the part time rate?
·
Huber – Yes, the part time rate
would be a little over 4,000. The credit rate is the same as the MFA
credit
rate.
·
Bayne:
1. Under the “need for the program”, where there any market
studies or surveys done?
2. Is there data on how many people might be interested in this
program?
·
Huber:
1.
There is a chart in the back
containing 4 examples of programs where someone can take graduate
credits (separate
from an MFA degree) within a low residency model.
2.
Sixty-five percent of students
are from Connecticut and surrounding states. We have had quite a few
inquiries
throughout the years from local students. There are a number of local
writing
workshops where students want to go up to the next level, but are not
ready for
the MFA program.
·
Garvey – This is different than
face to face feedback, it could potentially be an extension of the
workshop.
The transferrable credit is a good opportunity.
·
Sally – The proposal consists of
taking out the 5 month mentorship and clustering two of them together.
The idea
behind it is at the end of this mentorship process, they will have a
book.
Motion:
Margaret McClure moves to approve; Ryan Drake seconds |
Comments
·
McClure – I think it is a good
secondary option.
·
McSweeney – I think it is
competitive given there is nothing like it.
·
Bayne – Because we can
offer a program, should we? Is this
a feeder to the MFA -
Creative
Writing? I don’t know if it
is good
reason for adding a program. Is this the right curriculum or does this
enhance
the curriculum for the College?
·
Sally – I don’t think it changes
the curriculum at all.
·
Garvey – Without University
College, this may take the place for that community.
·
Jones –Thinks the certificate
proposal
is applicable for this particular type of program.
·
Sally – I think that the
certificates were largely created to deal with the material reality of
the master’s
degree programs in the CAS. We
are now above
20 in four of our programs. The
MFA used
to have 40, now it has 80. We
are trying
to enhance our programs that are already
here, rather
than creating new graduate programs. Currently, nothing new is being
proposed
in the certificate programs - only a clustering of what already exists.
In terms of curriculum, I don’t see there
being any changes. This may be a way to bring in new students.
·
Drake – Since the closing of
University College, this seems to be a replacement version. This seems
to be a
little more integrated. It appears there is a desire to do this by the
faculty,
and they are willing to take on the hard work.
·
Nash – Agrees, and likes the fact
that it doesn’t cost anything. If
no one
takes it, there’s no output of money.
Vote:
All in favor; motion passes unanimously |
Islamic World Studies Minor Proposal
·
Ruffini – This is the second
version of the proposal the Committee has seen. Martin is teaching, so
David
Crawford will explain the new, improved version.
·
Crawford –There were procedural
issues such as lack of minutes. We
submitted
minutes from the last meeting. We did a better job on governance
structure and reassessing where we are.
·
Bayne – Concerned about the
governance structure - If a professor does not teach two Islamic
courses, they
would not be eligible to be on the steering committee.
·
Crawford – We would have to
change the governance from teaching 2 courses and 1 every other year TO
teach 1 course every other year.
·
Nash:
1. Can this be proposed regardless of the history course listed
that
is not yet approved?
2. Do you have a Program Director?
·
Crawford -
1. Yes, there is a course or two that Sunil is in the process of
getting approved, etc. The
course is
in there primarily as a place
holder.
2. We have a Program
Director, but we did not ask for a stipend.
·
Ruffini – Why one Arabic course as
opposed to two?
·
Crawford – In the first Arabic
course, there is so much
cultural
expression in the way the language is structured and how it is different
from the
western language. That is valuable in itself.
By the second level, you are memorizing vocabulary and how to
conjugate verbs.
Although this is still valuable, we didn’t want it to take the place of
other courses.
·
Garvey – With the schools as they
are situated now, you would do yourself a service having a director’s
stipend
in the budget as a formality.
·
Jones – Suggests adding a stipend
in the budget, for the Director, after the minor is established.
·
McFadden – A budget for the
program should be established from the very beginning.
Motion:
Terry Ann Jones motions to approve; Ryan Drake seconds Suggestions
for improvement 1. Once the minor is established, a stipend
should be set for the Director. 2. The minor should establish
a budget from the beginning. |
Comments: Committee
agrees there is student interest in this area.
Vote:
All in favor; motion passes unanimously |
Course Proposals
AS 484 Health and Healing in America,
1650-2000
Motion:
David McFadden moves to approve; Jackie Vernarelli seconds |
·
McFadden – Louise Palmer
developed these courses for undergraduates in Health and Healing in
America and
in Western Science. They have been very successful.
This was a request from Nursing Studies - developing
a graduate level course in American Studies.
·
McSweeney:
1. There was not a final exam statement on the syllabus; I’d like
to see that put in (an explanation).
2. How often will
this run?
·
McFadden:
1. There should be
a final paper; it must have
been left out.
2. It will not replace the way American
Studies works; it will be offered in rotation.
·
Bayne - Recommends putting in the
number of unexcused absences allowed.
·
Ruffini – Points to be passed on:
1.
Final paper deadline
2.
Grad statement on plagiarism
3.
Correcting the statement on
excused absences
Vote:
All in favor; motion passes unanimously |
PH 283 Philosophy and Pornography
Motion:
Laura McSweeney moves to approve; Johanna Garvey seconds Vote:
All in favor; motion passes unanimously |
McSweeney –
A well written proposal, the minutes answered everything I needed to
see.
BI 216 Principles of Epidemiology
Motion:
Laura Nash moves to approve; Laura McSweeney seconds |
·
Vernarelli – This course is
developed
from splitting what used to be BI 317, which was a 3 course, plus a 3
hour lab
- an overambitious two courses, combined into one course.
I had initially taught this course in
conjunction with BI 317. I
felt like I
could not expand epidemiology within the lecture portion of the course.
A separate
course at the 200 level would allow me to:
o
Go more in depth with key
concepts and topics.
o
Make it more broadly applicable.
o
Enable me to give an exam.
We have students interested in pursuing
public health. I would like to know, with confidence, that they have
understood
these concepts before recommending them for future graduate work.
·
Bayne:
1. For unexcused
absences
you get a zero for an in class assignment, but is there a penalty for
not attending?
2. If the grading
in this course follows
standard guidelines, final grades do not have D+ or D-.
You can
use that for in class grades only.
·
Vernarelli:
1.
There is no penalty for not
attending unless they miss in class assignments, which are unannounced.
2.
The final grades will not contain
D+ or D-. I will make that change or add a line explaining this is for
in class
assignments.
·
Drake – Suggests noting office
hours are by appointment.
Vote:
8 in favor; 1 abstention, motion passes |
Psychology
Bachelors
Revisions
·
McClure – This is coming out of our Program Review.
o
We looked at competitor institutions.
o
We have added several new faculty members in our department within the
last few years.
o
Simultaneously,
the
American Psychological Association has revised their guidelines for
undergraduate education.
These three streams have converged and we are proposing to change our
curriculum. Presently, we
offer two
degrees, a B.A. and a B.S. We
feel as
though this does not reflect the current state of
Psychology, so we are proposing to offer only 1 degree, a B.S.
We do not anticipate any changes in terms of
the number of majors or courses that will be offered.
·
Vernarelli – What percentage of students currently have a B.A.?
·
McClure – The large majority of current students have a B.A.
Our current B.S. degree is the B.A. plus pre-med.
It is very burdensome for students that are not
going into medical school or the health professions program.
·
Bayne – How will the enrollment of the other natural science
departments be affected as a result of the change?
·
McClure – We are not requiring any courses outside of psychology for
the B.S. We conceptualize this as psychology is a science, a behavioral
science. We feel a B.S. is
a better
title for what we offer. The
courses
will not change.
Motion:
Laura McSweeney moves to
approve; Laura Nash seconds Vote:
8 in favor, 1 abstention; motion passes |
Routing
Procedures
for Courses Outside of Departments and Programs
Ruffini notes this will be back on the agenda for the April meeting.
Meeting adjourned at 4:47 p.m.
Minutes Submitted by: Jean
Siconolfi