Committee on University College
Annual Report
Committee membership:
Patricia Calderwood, Chair
Betsy Bowen
Chris Huntley
Carole Pomerico
Sallyanne Ryan
Doug Lyon
Edna Wilson
The committee on University College
met formally 4 times this academic year:
Monday September 15, 2003 (in
attendance: Bowen, Calderwood, Huntley, Pomerico, Ryan, Wilson)
Monday October 20, 2003 (in
attendance: Bowen, Calderwood, Huntley, Pomerico, Ryan, Wilson)
Wednesday, December 10, 2003 (in
attendance: Bowen, Calderwood, Huntley, Pomerico, Ryan, Wilson)
Wednesday March 31, 2003 (in
attendance: Bowen, Calderwood, Huntley, Wilson)
Principal topics considered:
- Preparation for and implementation of a Faculty
Development Session on December 10, 2003, in coordination with the
FDEC. The focus of the
session was to inform the faculty about teaching in University College,
study abroad (and its fun corollary, teaching abroad), and advising the
adult learner. About 25
faculty attended the workshop. Carole Pomerico was our lead faculty person
for the workshop. She worked
closely with Dean Wilson on the project.
- Examination of the Journal of Record, undertaken by
Betsy Bowen and Chris Huntley. This investigation was undertaken in order
to ascertain that practice is consistent with policy. This appears to be so. (If there
are questions that we cannot answer at the general faculty meeting, we
will include them on our agenda for next year.)
- Initial examination of an ÒincubatorÓ role University
College can play for new programs that are not easily housed in existing
departments, but that respond to emerging needs and demands. The committee will maintain
its continuing emphasis on following the established approval process laid
out in the Handbook.
- The committee suggested that Dean Wilson meet with
new faculty early in the year to welcome and inform them about University
College. In response, Dean
Wilson has agreed to hold a welcome lunch, sponsored by this committee,
for new faculty.
- The committee suggested that Dean Wilson invite
second year faculty to serve on the DeanÕs Advisory Council and/or other
advisory groups that might be formed. There are several positive anticipated effects: the fresh, new perspectives of our
colleagues will enrich University college administration and personnel;
our newer colleagues will have additional opportunities for service to the
University. In response, Dean
Wilson will inquire among second year faculty about their interest in
participating.
Future agenda items
- The committee will work to clarify its charge to
study and make recommendations on academic policies for the undergraduate
program of UC. One important consideration is to find or develop good
models for thinking through ideas, so as to allow for growth and
responsiveness. The committee will consider ways to clarify the formal
process that includes faculty at all stages.
- The committee will discuss possibilities for
continued or new collaboration with the other schools of the University.
- The committee will consider how University College
can carry out the Jesuit ideals of meeting the unmet needs of the
community, such as financial aid for part-time students.
To Father Van Arx:
One of the most important foci of
the committee on University College has been to assist Dean Wilson in a
forward-looking change in the way that University College operates. We have concentrated on strengthening
the interactions between University College and the University faculty
governance system, supported the Dean as she has developed good working
relations with University departments, and encouraged innovation in the
enlistment of interested faculty for teaching, advising and other activities
with University College. In our
roles as representatives of the faculty we are hopeful that University College
can continue and expand its productive work. We need support to increase faculty involvement in
teaching and advising of UC students, through encouragement of innovation with
regard to faculty load, adequate support for departments so that each can
further develop their collaboration with University College without further
strain on their resources, and sufficient compensation for faculty who take on
work with University College in addition to their basic teaching load. We also look for leadership in finding
ways to serve our local communityÕs unmet needs, perhaps by increased funding
to assist part-time students.