Annual Report of the University
College Committee
Academic Year 2006-07
Submitted May 1, 2007
1. Committee chairperson: Emily
R. Smith
2. Committee membership
Bruce Bradford (DSOB)
Suzanne Campbell (SON)
Laura McSweeney (Mathematics & CS)
Rose Rodrigues (Sociology & Anthropology)
Emily Smith (GSEAP)
Brian Torff (Visual and Performing Arts)
Edna Wilson (Dean UC, ex officio)
3. Meetings attended:
The Committee met 8 times during the 2006-2007 year. All members of
this committee attended and participated reliably. Members who
could not attend a meeting could send comments on the scheduled agenda
items. Specific attendance follows:
Bradford [5]
Campbell [8]
McSweeney [7]
Perkus (ex-officio/invited guest) [2]
Rodrigues [6]
Smith [7]
Torff [7
Wilson [6]
4. Dates of meetings:
September 19, 2006
October 20, 2006
November 15, 2006
December 13, 2006
January 24, 2007
February 28, 2007
March 21, 2007
April 25, 2007
5. List of principal topics
considered by the committee:
Concerns regarding on-line courses:
Committee members discussed several issues related to on-line courses,
including the impact of on-line courses on traditional classes, the
scheduling and approval of on-line courses, the quality of instruction,
competing enrollments between grounded and on-line classes, the
evaluation of on-line courses, and the assessment of student learning
in on-line courses.
Improving Communication between UC
and Full-Time Faculty: The Committee continued to discuss ways
to improve communication between UC, full-time faculty, and department
chairs from the various colleges/schools whose faculty teach for UC,
particularly around the development, approval and implementation of
on-line courses. Also discussed need for greater full-time faculty
involvement in UC and to provide information to faculty about the type
of programs UC offers and how many students are served.
Evaluation of Adjuncts: The
Committee discussed current ways by which the departments and UC
evaluate adjunct professors and considered the value of developing more
consistent and effective ways of assessing adjunct professors.
Revision of the Handbook description
of the UC committee: The Committee submitted the proposed
change of the UC charge (“To act as a formal communication link between
faculty and the undergraduate and
graduate components of the
School of Continuing Education on matters of educational and
administrative policies”) to both the Academic Council and the General
Faculty. The change was approved by the General Faculty at the April
13th, 2007 GFM.
Review and Revision of Procedures for
Building the Course Schedule for University College: The major
work of the Committee this year focused on reviewing and revising the
procedures for approving and developing the UC course schedule.
Completion of this task involved substantial discussion of issues
related to UC and department chair communication, issues related to
on-line courses (see above), hiring and evaluating adjuncts, and how to
distribute these procedures to all faculty.
Development of UC Governance
Document: As a result of our work on the Procedures for
Building the UC Schedule, the Committee considered the need to update
and revise UC’s Governance document (of which these revised Procedures
would be a part).
6. List of decisions taken by
the committee:
Distribute Revised Procedures for
Building UC Course Schedule. The Dean of UC will send out the
revised Procedures for Building the UC Course Schedule to department
chairs each semester.
Revision of the Handbook description
of the UC committee: The Committee proposed the revision
of the General Purpose and Specific Duties of the committee. The
proposed revision was approved by Academic Council and the General
Faculty.
7. Anticipated effects of these
decisions:
Distribution of Procedures for
Building UC Schedule: The intention is that the revised
Procedures will underscore the importance of ongoing communication
between UC and department chairs and make the process for developing,
approving and scheduling courses in UC clearer and uniform.
Revision of the Handbook description
of the UC committee: The revised committee description
will align the Handbook description to the Committee’s current practice
of discussing both undergraduate and graduate programs offered through
UC.
8. Unfinished business:
Responding to the needs of Adult
Learners in UC: Developing courses of interest to adult
learners, and identifying and addressing barriers faced by adult and
part-time learners.
Establishing a UC Curriculum
Committee: Consider both the need for a UC Curriculum Committee
and the role that UC might serve on this committee.
Infusion of Jesuit Mission into UC:
In conjunction with Goal #3 of the Strategic Plan, the committee needs
to be updated on efforts in this area of infusing the Jesuit mission
into graduate education and discuss ways of supporting these efforts.
Development of UC Governance
Document: The committee just began this work this year and
hopes to continue it next year.
Evaluation of Adjuncts:
Developing a uniform and effective process for evaluating adjunct
professors.
9. Future agenda items:
The 2007-2008 UC Committee could spend the year updating the UC
Governance document.
Examine current practices and procedures for soliciting faculty to
teach for UC and make changes where necessary to reflect schools’
differing needs and policies.
Provide more information and guidance to faculty about study abroad
programs and transfer credits so that faculty can advise students
appropriately on course selection. This could be done at a GFM.
In addition, the other “Unfinished business” is equally important and
could be addressed by next year’s committee.